Archive | vaccination and immunisation RSS feed for this section

Mr. Mumpy #2

Micah has now succumbed to the mumps.  I had hoped that they’d all get it in one go.  But, so far, they’ve waited a good 2 weeks each before they got it.  If this carries on and the entire family gets it, we’ll have all been out of commission for 10 weeks!  Well, we’ve not been entirely out of commission, as life circumstances have forced us to be out and about at times.  And some kind friends have welcomed us around, despite the mumps risk.  :)  

Micah is on Day 2 so far and is a nice plumpy, mumpy.  He is mostly happy though, even without pain meds.  He slept fine all night last night, without the need for pain meds at all.  This morning he was a little sore, but 10 minutes of the pain meds, he ate his breakfast hungrily and then had a good happy chat to granny on Skype.  Aside from the swollen jowls, he could be fooling us all!  

 2010_08_06

(Since having started this post, a couple more days have passed.  His swelling is completely down.  His mumps followed Sam’s footsteps – by the third day the pain seemed to have completely gone and the swelling disappeared by day 4.)

Interestingly, his mumps came at the same time that I read this online:

American’s Immunity to Mumps Less than Ideal

Basically, the article goes to point out that mumps is still around and the rate is higher than they’d like for a community that is already 90% immunised.   What I found interesting, was that a) even the CDC says that the MMR is only 80% effective for the prevention of mumps and b) researchers are now questioning whether the two doses of MMR that children are supposed to receive are, in fact, good enough.  A study of recent outbreaks showed that many of the young people who became sick had actually received two doses of the MMR vaccine, considered sufficient to prevent outbreaks. 

So, what is the point exactly?  Again, my frustration lies with the fact that this preventative measure for an illness that is almost never serious involves injecting our kids with neurotoxins and carcinogens, which have been directly associated with cancers, neurological illness and auto-immune diseases of our age.  And, then, to discover that this preventative measure is actually not all that effective; that the kids who get mumps are oftentimes recipients of the MMR (like my daughter, Kiera) and that the medical community are now suggesting another (3rd) dose of MMR to take on this anomaly … well, I do wonder what the point is.

Here’s a novel idea.  How about we just let our kids get mumps?  The advantages, as far as I can see, outweigh the disadvantages.  In exchange for an average of 4-10 days of pain that can be easily managed with painkillers:

  1. the younger you are when you get it, the less severe the pain and length of illness (for Sam, at almost 4, it lasted 4 days)
  2. it’s almost guaranteed to give one lifetime immunity once you’ve had the disease
  3. being exposed to the natural illness again and again in one’s life, as one encounters others who get mumps, serves only to strengthen one’s natural immunity against mumps.  Not being exposed is apparently a disadvantage to the community because there is no opportunity to strengthen one’s natural immunity.   

Perhaps I wouldn’t be saying this, if my kids’ reactions were far more severe and life-threatening.  But then again, perhaps I would be even more vaccine-suspicious if my kids were obviously vaccine-injured.  We’re fortunate, for the moment, to have suffered little in both the disease and the vaccine camps.  Yet,  I still feel a huge sense of frustration that us parents, and many of the doctors advising us, are clueless about the dangers either way.  Oh for the truth to emerge for once and for all!  And soon.

Read full storyComments { 3 }

Vit K at birth

It is routine in South Africa, and many other countries, to inject a newborn with a jab of Vitamin K.  In my research prior to having Micah, I became convinced that vaccinations could cause more harm than good.  I covered all the standard schedule vaccines, but somewhere along the line, I never did factor in Vit K.  In fact, I forgot all about that injection, until I had just given birth to Micah and had to make a decision in the labour room.  My midwife felt it was good decision (I love my midwife and she’s always been balanced and transparent about vaccines) and Craig felt so too.  So, Micah got a jab.  His first and last. 

I’ve not thought much about it since.  Until Dr Tenpenny’s site referred me to this website Daily Med, a government website with current medical information.  Amongst other things, it contains comprehensive information about vaccines.  It also happens to have a full report on the Vit K jab.

The package insert states the following for newborns:

Prophylaxis of Hemorrhagic Disease of the Newborn

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that vitamin K1 be given to the newborn. A single intramuscular dose of Vitamin K1 Injection 0.5 to 1 mg within one hour of birth is recommended.

But, after reading the rest of the Vit K drug label, I really wished that we hadn’t given Micah this jab. Aside from the fact that Hemorrhagic disease is extremely rare, the drug label contains advice that seems contradictory to the administration requirements.  Basically, the insert says "inject this into newborns INTRAMUSCULARLY within an hour of birth."  (It’s a purely preventative step, since one cannot determine whether the child has that disease in that short space of time.)  But, the package insert is headed with a large print, blocked off warning that warn of death – particularly when the drug has been administered INTRAMUSCULARLY.  Hello?????????

Fullscreen capture 20100730 113852 PM.bmp

It doesn’t end there.  The adverse effects and warnings include (I’ve highlighted some noteworthy statements)

Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility

Studies of carcinogenicity, mutagenesis or impairment of fertility have not been conducted with Vitamin K1 Injection (Phytonadione Injectable Emulsion, USP).

Pregnancy

Pregnancy Category C: Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with Vitamin K1 Injection. It is also not known whether Vitamin K1Injection can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity. Vitamin K1 Injection should be given to a pregnant woman only if clearly needed. (why, if a pregnant woman should only get Vit K injected if clearly needed, when the effects on the fetus is unknown, why is it okay to inject directly into a few minutes old newborn?)

Nursing Mothers

It is not known whether this drug is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, caution should be exercised when Vitamin K1 Injection is administered to a nursing woman.

Pediatric Use

Hemolysis, jaundice, and hyperbilirubinemia in neonates, particularly those that are premature, may be related to the dose of Vitamin K1 Injection. Therefore, the recommended dose should not be exceeded (see ADVERSE REACTIONS and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).

WARNING: This product contains aluminum that may be toxic. Aluminum may reach toxic levels with prolonged parenteral administration if kidney function is impaired. Premature neonates are particularly at risk because their kidneys are immature, and they required large amounts of calcium and phosphate solutions, which contain aluminum.

My biggest concern about vaccinations is that they’re preventative measures.  We’re required to inject our kids with known toxins and carcinogens as a preventative measure for something they may never encounter, never mind actually get – something that 95% of the time runs its course with little to no after effects (aside from lifetime immunity, of course).  I completely get the idea that sometimes we use known poisons to fight an existing and potentially fatal illness.  That I understand – if the odds are "dead if I don’t" then suddenly the not-necessarily lethal poison in the drug used to fight the disease seems like a reasonable risk.  But, when the odds are "well, you may be exposed to some illness, that you may catch, that you may have a horrible case of it, that you may suffer ill effects thereafter or may possibly die, if you get it in the first place", I don’t know if the risk is worth it. 

That’s my take.  And, as always, I’m not saying that every parent who reads this post and yet decides to vaccinate is wrong, idiotic or unloving.  I’m just saying that the drug itself is suspect as far as I understand it and I a) am not willing to support it and b) wish more people knew about it in order to be able to make a more informed decision.  You may read this and still vaccinate your children because you believe that is the right thing to do.  And that is your right and responsibility as the parent: to do what you think is in the best interests of your child.

You can read more on the subject over at Daily Med or click on the links below.

Drug Label Sections

Read full storyComments { 0 }

Ms. Mumpy

14 days after Sam presented with his mumps, Kiera succumbed too.  While she didn’t swell up as much as he did, hers lasted a lot longer (about 9 days to his 4 days) and seemed to be a lot more painful. 

IMG_8546 

IMG_8540

She found warm beanbags offered some pain relief.  The beanbags were sometimes too hot, so we improvised with some cosy covers – aka beanies!  She did look rather comical with two heads on either side of her.

IMG_8535

Especially when we added one for her head :)

IMG_8543

The stats in the family so far are:

Kiera, (vaccinated with MMR)

  • not a lot of swelling
  • more pain and fever than Sam, however; struggled to open mouth and walked around with her lower jaw pushed forward for about 4 days as it relieved the pressure somewhat (and that explains the gritted teeth look she is giving me in one of the photos above!)
  • mumps lasted 9 days

Sam, (not vaccinated with MMR, but has had other vaccinations in the 1-12m schedule)

  • very swollen, both sides
  • painful for 2 1/2 days only
  • recovered by day 4

Being distrustful of vaccinations these days, the observations above are interesting, even if not scientific proof :)   We’re still waiting to see if either of the other two get it.  I expect Micah will, given that he has just about shared spit with Sam and Kiera every day for the past month (he loves giving wet sloppy mouth kisses, in case you’re wondering!)  But, so far there have been no signs.  But with mumps, that can change overnight.

Read full storyComments { 1 }

Mr Mumpy

We’re a bit behind on the blogging front.  So, I’m playing catch up.  Keep posted for some World Cup photos and a great review on a new recycling collection company we’re privileged to use!

IMG_8452In the meantime, here are some pics of our very own Mr Mumps.  Yup, Sam caught the current illness doing the rounds.  He was exposed at a friend’s party and succumbed 2 1/2 weeks later. 

The boy woke up in the middle of the night last Wednesday thirsty and with sore ears.  We realised why the next morning when I went to his room and discovered the Hamster Hayes look on the one side of his face.  "Oh dear, Sam.  You’ve got mumps!"

He spent the morning sleeping, woke up feeling miserable and sore.  Some kids’ neurofen gave him his bounce back and he spent the rest of the afternoon running around as if nothing was amiss.  So much for bed rest.  How does one enforce bed rest with a 3-year old?

He had a few other moments of pain-induced misery, but kids’ neurofen kept most of the pain away, so it was only in those non-medicated moments that he felt gross.  A good afternoon sleep sorted out some of the aches too.  And, we upped the Vit D, Barleylife, garlic and gave him some silver ions too – giving his little immune system some added help.

Day two saw him with both sides swollen and a miserable disposition.  More warm bean bags and sleep and neurofen helped a lot!  Poor boy!  He wasn’t happy, but he soldiered on bravely.  He didn’t even freak out at our teasing, accepting the titles "Mumps" "Mr Mumps" and "Mumpy" with good grace and even a smile. 

IMG_8456

By Day 3 he was already going down in the swelling department and by the end of the day, it was as if he never had it.  Aside from some swelling, he was pain-free and happy as Larry.  Day 4 and Day 5 he had slightly swollen glands under his jaw bone.  By Day 6 he was 100% mumps free! 

We are waiting to see if Micah is going to get it too.  The girls were vaccinated in my vaccine-ambivalent days, plus they were exposed to the original source over a month ago too.  But, we’ve been laying low anyway, just in case!

Interestingly, from the cases I’ve heard about in Cape Town, it seems that half the kids who got it actually were vaccinated.  So much for 80% efficacy of the MMR.  Mumps is mostly a harmless childhood illness.  Sterility is only a concern in adult or teenaged males if the swelling presents in the testes and if it presents in BOTH testes.  In children, in very rare cases, meningitis and/or encephalitis can occur.  However, in most worst cases, the illness, although unpleasant, lasts at most a week and recovery is complete and immunity is 100% thereafter. 

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Read full storyComments { 7 }